After repeated failures in caring for system-involved youth, Pa. needs an Office of the Child Advocate with ‘teeth’

Malik Pickett and Bree Hood, The Philadelphia Inquirer •

We know the impact this office can have because Philadelphia is leading the way, having created a similar office that has helped countless children and families.

Gov. Josh Shapiro recently stated that his office supports codifying a statewide Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) and, importantly, wants the office to have “teeth.” This comes in the wake of yet another tragic death of a child in the system. One thing is clear — Pennsylvania’s children cannot afford to wait for this office to be reinstated with authority.

As an attorney and a youth advocate working with the Juvenile Law Center, we are encouraged by those remarks. Calls for an OCA date back to 2001, and since then, Pennsylvania has experienced failure after failure in which children were abused in the juvenile legal and child welfare systems.

Advocates recently held an event titled “Brown Bags and Big Voices,” where youth with system expertise, their families, and other stakeholders highlighted the need for someone responsible for protecting children from harm and helping direct families to needed resources. An OCA can do just that.

Pennsylvania needs an OCA because our systems are not protecting our children or ensuring their needs are met. And as Shapiro has said, it should be empowered and have “teeth.” That requires the office to have specific powers, roles, and responsibilities.
The video player is currently playing an ad.

First, the office should be independent, meaning not controlled by the Department of Human Services, which oversees the juvenile justice and child welfare systems across the state. Independence will ensure the children within these systems feel safe talking to the OCA about the things that are happening. No child in the system would feel comfortable complaining to the facility staff who are maltreating them, or to the entity that continues to license those facilities.

Additionally, many children do not understand that they have rights and that they can report if their needs aren’t met or if they are feeling unsafe. The OCA can educate both children and their families on their rights and how to report something so the office can intervene as a neutral party.

Specifically, the office should receive complaints and investigate through private one-on-one conversations with children and reviewing facility documentation. Staff should never be present when children talk to the OCA, because children are more comfortable disclosing issues if facility staff are not able to hear or see them.

Further, the OCA should be allowed to make unannounced visits to facilities, and facilities should not be able to deny entry. Unannounced visits will allow the OCA to understand what happens on a day-to-day basis and gain a clear picture of facility conditions.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

About the Expert
Malik Pickett is a staff attorney at Juvenile Law Center who joined the organization in 2020. He advocates for the rights of youth in the juvenile justice system through litigation, amicus and policy advocacy efforts. Prior to joining Juvenile Law Center, Pickett worked as an associate attorney with the law firm of Wade Clark Mulcahy, LLP where he litigated personal injury and construction defect cases and as a legislative counsel for the Honorable Pennsylvania State Senators Shirley M. Kitchen and Jay Costa.