Posts in 'Amicus Curiae'

Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
Illinois Supreme Court •
We argued that a lengthy sentence imposed on a youth, which precludes a meaningful opportunity to obtain release, violates the Eighth Amendment. We further argued that Illinois sentencing structure, which imposes an automatic 25 years-to-life in firearm enhancements on top of mandatory minimums on youth tried as adults, fails to meaningfully consider youth as required by Miller and Montgomery.
Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court •
Amici argued that mandatory sentencing that imposes harsh adult consequences on juvenile offenders without any individualized consideration of age or other mitigating circumstances contravenes the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Keeping Kids in the Community
U.S. Supreme Court •
Our brief argued that discriminating against prospective foster parents on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity harms children and diminishes their ability to achieve permanency.
Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
U.S. Supreme Court •
The amicus brief argued that Miller and Montgomery establish a presumption against imposing life without parole sentences on juveniles and requires a finding that the juvenile is permanently incorrigible and incapable of reform.
Keeping Kids in the Community
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit •
Our brief argues that overruling Parsons and decertifying the class in B.K. would have a serious, adverse effect on class action impact litigation, and that it would have an especially negative impact on access to the courts and appropriate relief for system-involved children who are subjected to constitutional wrongs.
Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
Iowa Supreme Court •
The brief argued that greater procedural protections—including the right to counsel—are required during parole hearings to ensure that juveniles serving life sentences are given a meaningful opportunity to obtain release as required by Graham.
Youth Tried as Adults
Kentucky Supreme Court •
Juvenile Law Center, joined by more than a dozen advocacy organizations, filed an amicus brief in the Kentucky Supreme Court in support of Mr. Bredhold and the trial court’s decision. We argued that objective indicia of evolving standards of decency and research in neuroscience require abolition of the death penalty for individuals who were under 21 years of age at the time of their offense.
Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
Michigan Supreme Court •

Juvenile Law Center filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court on behalf of Kenya Hyatt, who was sentenced to life without parole under

Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)
California Supreme Court •

Juvenile Law Center filed an amicus brief in the California Supreme Court on behalf of Johnny Mendoza, who was sentenced to life without parole for

Youth Tried as Adults
U.S. Supreme Court •
Our brief urged the court to grant review to address the constitutionality of Ohio's felony murder statute as applied to juveniles because it prescribes a mandatory 15 years to life sentence without consideration of youth.