Racial Justice Amicus and Appellate Strategies June 2022
Constitutional Challenges to Racial Disparities and Bias in the Juvenile and Criminal Legal Systems
Below is a guide to amicus and appellate arguments Juvenile Law Center has set forth in recent years challenging racially biased laws and practices as unconstitutional. This resource for attorneys seeking to bolster their appellate and amicus arguments will be updated with some regularity, and all of Juvenile Law Center’s briefs can be found on our Legal Docket. Our attorneys are also available to help you think through legal challenges to highlight racial impact and to provide amicus support in appeals.
Racial disparities take place at every stage of the juvenile and criminal legal systems: at stop and seizure, interrogation, arrest, adjudication, transfer, direct file, adult incarceration, and sentencing. For current data on racial disparities, see The Sentencing Project and The Burns Institute. Research also shows that Black youth tend to be perceived as older and more culpable than their white peers, which impacts prosecutorial charging decisions and judicial findings. These disparities and perceptions do not emerge out of nowhere: as scholars have shown, the transition from slavery to Black Codes, Convict Leasing, and Jim Crow laws have shaped our criminal and juvenile legal systems.
As described below, this information can shape legal arguments to explicitly challenge racism in our system. Advocates can also expand on these arguments, applying the same theories in new contexts.