Legal Docket

Use the filters on the left to browse our legal docket.  For more information on race equity arguments, use this tool.

Date
371 - 380 of 447 resultsReset
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

U.S. Supreme Court •

These briefs involved a thirteen-year-old student who was questioned by four adults, including a uniformed police officer, on school grounds regarding a series of break-ins. Juvenile Law Center argued that the student should have been considered in custody for Miranda purposes.

Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)

State v. Rudy B.

New Mexico Supreme Court •
Argued that a provision in New Mexico state law allowing juveniles to be sentenced by juvenile court judges as adults if the judge found them “not amenable to treatment” was unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment.
Youth Tried as Adults

State v. Fernandes

Connecticut Supreme Court •
This brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court dealt with a Connecticut statute governing transfer of juveniles to adult court. Amici argued that the statute, which gave the prosecutor sole discretion to transfer a juvenile's case to the adult criminal system, deprived juveniles of their right to due process.
Youth Tried as Adults

State v. B.B.

Connecticut Supreme Court •
This brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court dealt with a Connecticut statute that allows a prosecutor to choose the forum in which youthful offenders are tried. Amici argued that this statute deprived youthful offenders of their right to due process by placing sole discretion to waive in the hands of the prosecutor.

In re T.B.

Pennsylvania Superior Court •
Challenged the court’s finding that an autistic juvenile was competent to stand trial and that there was sufficient grounds to adjudicate the juvenile delinquent based on resisting arrest and related charges.
Youth Tried as Adults

Commonwealth v. J.B.

Pennsylvania Superior Court •
Juvenile Law Center and two private attorneys filed a brief on behalf of an eleven-year-old charged with the murder of his stepmother. The brief argued that the trial court’s interpretation of the transfer statute requiring the juvenile’s confession at the pre-adjudicatory decertification hearing in order to demonstrate his ability to be rehabilitated in the juvenile system was in violation of his right against self-incrimination and rights to due process and fundamental fairness under both the Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions.
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit •
Argued on behalf of a student who had been suspended for writing a fake MySpace page that made derogatory statements about the student's principal.
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

Bellevue School District v. E.S.

Washington Supreme Court •
This brief argued that students have the right to counsel at the initial stage of a truancy proceeding under juvenile court jurisdiction.
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

People v. Austin M.

Illinois Supreme Court •
Supporting a juvenile defendant in Illinois who challenged the representation he received in court, when his defense lawyer sacrificed his defense believing that it was in the child’s "best interests."