Legal Docket

Use the filters on the left to browse our legal docket.  For more information on race equity arguments, use this tool.

Date
371 - 380 of 455 resultsReset
Records

Commonwealth v. Robinson

Pennsylvania Courts of Common Pleas •
Argued that a court should not consider an individual's juvenile record when deciding whether to impose the death penalty on him or her as an adult.
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

Camreta v. Greene

U.S. Supreme Court •
Juvenile Law Center's brief, filed in the United States Supreme Court, argued to affirm the Ninth Circuit's decision that the 4th Amendment warrant/probable cause protections applied to a nine-year-old girl due to law enforcement involvement in her seizure and questioning at school.
Solitary Confinement & Harsh Conditions

Troy D. v. Mickens

United States District Court, District of New Jersey •
Filed a federal civil rights lawsuit on behalf of two juveniles who were subjected to excessive and intolerable isolation while in the custody of the New Jersey Juvenile Justice Commission (JJC), claiming violations of substantive and procedural due process rights under federal and state law.
Records

Welch v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court •
Argued that juvenile adjudications should not be used to enhance adult sentences, since in juvenile court there is no jury, the culture is non-adversarial, defense attorneys are often overburdened and poorly resourced, unreliable evidence is often used, and appellate rights are either nonexistent or underutilized.
Youth Interrogations & Access to Counsel

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

U.S. Supreme Court •

These briefs involved a thirteen-year-old student who was questioned by four adults, including a uniformed police officer, on school grounds regarding a series of break-ins. Juvenile Law Center argued that the student should have been considered in custody for Miranda purposes.

Juvenile Life Without Parole (JLWOP)

State v. Rudy B.

New Mexico Supreme Court •
Argued that a provision in New Mexico state law allowing juveniles to be sentenced by juvenile court judges as adults if the judge found them “not amenable to treatment” was unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment.
Youth Tried as Adults

State v. B.B.

Connecticut Supreme Court •
This brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court dealt with a Connecticut statute that allows a prosecutor to choose the forum in which youthful offenders are tried. Amici argued that this statute deprived youthful offenders of their right to due process by placing sole discretion to waive in the hands of the prosecutor.
Youth Tried as Adults

State v. Fernandes

Connecticut Supreme Court •
This brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court dealt with a Connecticut statute governing transfer of juveniles to adult court. Amici argued that the statute, which gave the prosecutor sole discretion to transfer a juvenile's case to the adult criminal system, deprived juveniles of their right to due process.

In re T.B.

Pennsylvania Superior Court •
Challenged the court’s finding that an autistic juvenile was competent to stand trial and that there was sufficient grounds to adjudicate the juvenile delinquent based on resisting arrest and related charges.