Juvenile Law Center

Child Welfare|Juvenile and Criminal Justice|Education

Access to Education

Education offers children in the child welfare and justice systems a chance to develop the skills they need to become successful adults, as well as develop a sense of security. Sadly, students in both systems are more likely than their peers to be absent or truant,1 face disciplinary action,2 require evaluation and remedial services,3 perform below grade level,4 qualify for special education services,5 and drop out of high school.6,7 In collaboration with partner organizations, Juvenile Law Center engages in vigorous federal and state-level advocacy work.

We also offer technical assistance and trainings as well as develop publications for professionals in the legal, child welfare, and education fields, with an emphasis on the important role of cross-system collaboration. Juvenile Law Center works to address the education crisis faced by court-involved youth by supporting policies that:

  • Minimize educational disruptions for youth in the child welfare and justice systems;
  • Ensure that individuals in residential facilities receive a high quality education—whenever possible in the local public school;
  • Ensure that youth in both systems have access to the educational support and services they need to reach their full potential;
  • Eliminate inappropriate referrals from the education system to the justice and child welfare systems; and
  • Provide older youth with opportunities to succeed in higher education.

In September 2012, we worked with Education Law Center-PA to develop "Meeting the Educational Needs of Students in the Child Welfare System": tools for educators, school administrators, and counseling staff to understand the issues youth in the foster care system face, and to identify simple interventions that can make a difference helping youth in care succeed in school. These tools are supported by a grant from the Pennsylvania Developmental Disabilities Council. 


1 Zingraff, Matthew T., Jeffrey Leiter, Matthew C. Johnsen, and Kristen A. Myers. “The Mediating Effect of Good School Performance on the Maltreatment-Delinquency Relationship.” Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency 42.1 (1994): 62-91. Web. ; see also Children and Family Justice Center of Northwestern School of Law, Illinois, et. al. “In School, The Right School, Finish School: A Guide to Improving Educational Opportunities for Court-Involved Youth.” Philadelphia: National Childrens’ Law Center, (2005): 28. Web.
2Id.
3Id.
4Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). “Youth’s Needs and Services.” Juvenile Justice Bulletin April 2010: 1-10. Web.; see also McCroskey, Jacquelyn, D.S.W., & Carrie Watson, “Research on the Educational Experiences of Dependent and Delinquent Youth.” L.A. County Education Coordinating Council, 2005. Web. citing Lynn J. Meltzer et al., “An Analysis of the Learning Styles of Adolescent Delinquents”, Journal Learning Disabilities 17. (1984):600 and L.A. County Office of Education, Juvenile Court and Community Schools, School Accountability Report Card (2001-02).
5Tulman, Joseph B., and Douglas M. Weck. “Shutting Off the School-to-Prison Pipeline for Status Offenders with Education-Related Disabilities”, New York Law School Law Review 54. (2009-2010): 875, 882. Web. ; see also McCroskey & Watson, supra note 5, citing T. Rowand Robinson & Mary Jane K. Rapport, Providing Special Education in the Juvenile Justice System, 20 Remedial & Special Educ. 19, 19 (1999); see also David Osher, Anju Sidana & Patrick Kelly, Improving Conditions for Learning for Youth Who Are Neglected or Delinquent (2008), available at http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/resources/spotlight/cflbrief200803.asp.
6Neild, Ruth Curran & Robert Balfanz. Unfulfilled Promise: The Dimensions and Characteristics of Philadelphia’s Dropout Crisis 2000-2005. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Youth Transitions Collaborative eds., 2006. 37. Print.; see also McCroskey & Watson, supra note 5, at 3 citing Dunham, Roger G. & Geoffrey P. Alpert, “Keeping Juvenile Delinquents in School: A Prediction Model”, Adolescence 22. (1987): 45. Web. (stating that only 20 to 40% of youth in the juvenile justice system earn a diploma or GED).
7National Working Group on Foster Care and Education. Fact Sheet: Educational Outcomes for Children and Youth in Foster and Out-of-Home Care. Casey Family Programs, 2008. Web. 25 May 2011.

 

Last updated December 2011